A world without borders
By MarcoNandoz-01 •
What our world would have been like if there were no countries no borders and passports, and 1 world government?
John Lennon : Imagine
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwUGSYDKUxU
What our world would have been like if there were no countries no borders and passports, and 1 world government?
John Lennon : Imagine
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwUGSYDKUxU
Who decides who the leader will be ?
When you have mixed ancestry, you are already a Global Citizen :)
The only reason if something is not possible, it is because the lack of will ,and the too much comfort.
And who actually elects the government ?
By the way, John did not say anything about a government ..
in sci-fi films, this happens when either we are already at par with other spacefaring races or we are colonized.
expatriation, stellar-scale!
why did u log off with ur other id Marco ?
If there are no borders, Israel and Palestine will not exist, hence no more problems on a two state solution.
As we said, you utterly lack of facts and education,and your views with due all respects, are bigoted ,bias and no facts involved.
We discussed this already, don't ruin the topic.
You are just too extreme in your believes.
Oh yeah , 6millions will destroy a population of 7billion, your maths are really exquisite.
And the rest of the world doesn't need head choppers either.
Well I guess they are both equal.
Just keep Iran and KSA out of it!
KSA would be empty if this happens. Who wants to live in a prison.
I think all countries are open to this, but im 100% sure that not all the country in the middle east will allow this one, KSA will be very strict, so dont expect this one buddy, dont post this, your just dreaming
and this on will never be happen,
at Doha Bank Tower...
Nothing to worry about..
he is here for the sun sand n sea
TC...I still like you...:)
YH...no worries. I guess you havent had time to look at my signatureline...:)
QDCLover..what brings you here, I mean out of your country which aint poor and in all probability has deprived you of a better life.
ppl will fight for delicious bbq kabab's
I for one would love that cos as it is I am a mess when it comes to origin and ancestry, what with each of parents, grandparents, and great parents all being of totally mixed parentage and origin.
One world with no borders would mean I can say in fact I am truly a citizen of planet earth, something I proclaim even now, but the difference would be I won't get any weird looks!
In any case we are all travelers in this world...would be great to identify ourselves as such and end all the nationality conflicts and patriotic boasting!
However that will not of course be a solution for all of the other trials and calamities that prevail amongst us today. In fact we can then expect a host of new ones cos man being man, will never be able to survive in complete peace and unity...troubles will still arise, crimes and oppression will continue even if we are all supposedly a part of one nation. Such is mankind!
A world without borders has already in war.
@happygolucky:
Your comprehension is very weak, I must say. Keep on thinking whatever you like.
Well guys, you can stop bickering about India, Pakistan etc. now. IF there are no borders, you all will be united again :)
Religion will never let it happen.
The one world idea is canceled
HGL, i hate you :)
India has 100s of millions of desperatly poor people who would flood out if given the chance of a better life elsewhere. (Something they are denied in India)
However I have learnt something new today, I didn't know calling a geographical piece of land was racist. The dictinonary definintion must have changed.
YH...good to see that you have accepted that it was intervention and not invasion by India. So now the next step to understand the reason why India intervened (not invaded). Simply put, if two fellows are fighting which may affect me, guess I would intervene to safeguard my interest and then it is only an intervention in my interest, not invasion...:)
@happygolucky: Please read the full article before picking specific words that suits your delusional idea.
Specifically read the heading "India's official engagement with Pakistan" and it's sub headings.
Before pointing finger that i am racist,look at yourself how you can take Indian name as 'poor countries like India'. I treat you as racist and from the same white thieve culture who loot other countries. Shame on you.India was rich country, If India is poor today it because of white people, and cultures which by their crooked ways rules india and looted and became rich. Do not call India Poor look at your back yard. I love my counry and i am proud of it and its past. YOu have no right to other racist when you ur self a recist.
Before pointing finger that i am racist,look at yourself how you can take Indian name as 'poor countries like India'. I treat you as racist and from the same white thieve culture who loot other countries. Shame on you.India was rich country, If India is poor today it because of white people, and cultures which by their crooked ways rules india and looted and became rich. Do not call India Poor look at your back yard. I love my counry and i am proud of it and its past. YOu have no right to other racist when you ur self a recist.
:) for TailChopper's comments.
@happygolucky: Simple answers:
1- It was internal conflict within the state of Pakistan (East and West)
2- India intervened. What they were doing on neighboring country's land? and why? With their army and ammunition?
Whatever words you use, India was in state of war with Pakistan. You are the first Indian who is in the state of denial with this fact.
And you did not comment on this section of the quote "The Bangladesh Liberation War was an armed conflict over a duration of about 9 months, putting East Pakistan and India against the State of Pakistan"
This will be a passport after WW 3, eventually the modern stone age
Can you imagine the taxes involved in supporting some countries? Although, I suppose if all natural resources and all profit are considered to be owned by all, it would level out the playing field a bit.
But now we're talking Socialism!
One govt, one tax system. Simple.
invading other country and looting wealth , oil is good :)
YK...thanks for quoting the wiki. So now let us read it right "The war started on 26 March 1971 between the State of Pakistan and East Pakistan, India intervened on 3 December 1971."....
- the war started by whom and between whom?
- India intervened (not invaded)?
Hope things are clear without writing pages and unnecessarily long arguements....:)
Again, you are calling "white people" thieves while paraphrasing. :) Not good .
ROFLMAO at some of these replies.
The only reason, from my point of view, that it isn't immediately possible, and would be difficult, is logistics. One government can not manage 7 billion people. You would end up having to create powerful area based governments who would report to the main government, and eventually, you'd end up with countries all over again.
Would be nice to get rid of visas though.
and of course there was the Indian Mutiny of 1857, such disloyal people.
bangladesh and pakistan r not countries they were 2 states of india divided by the thieves
Same to you boss.
Indians have openly declared rather proud to assist Mukti Bahini ("Liberation Army") in 1971. This is not a secret at all.
I can Quote Wiki Pedia "The Bangladesh Liberation War (Bengali: মুক্তিযুদ্ধ Muktijuddho) was an armed conflict over a duration of about 9 months, putting East Pakistan and India against the State of Pakistan. The war started on 26 March 1971 between the State of Pakistan and East Pakistan, India intervened on 3 December 1971. Armed conflict ended on 16 December 1971 and resulted in the secession of East Pakistan, which became the independent nation of Bangladesh."
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bangladesh_Liberation_War
If you call this distorted history, then I can't argue with you. :)
Yasir_Kh...I think you need to freshen up your history, the right one not the distorted one. Do that and we can talk.
abineet I did not know you were such a racist, labelling all white people the same. You are not ready to be a world citizen as you are a nationalistic bigot, who only believes in his own country. Shame on you.
lol @ some white western thieves
In olden days there were no passport and visa world was one country like and people lived in their own culture happily in countries like India with rich culture heritage and wealth. then some white western thieves from poor counties like britain etc came with out visas and looted friendly indian and became rich. Now they have no shame to call them self rich, which they forget that wealth is looted one.Kohinoor diamond is good example. still shines on british crown. Shame! And QDClover If you see these white thieves went to autralia( ur country) and looted aboriginal their also. and still they do not give legal rights to aboriginals in their own land, Shame less people. If whole world is one country these imagine how the world will be???
Its just a Dream, which would never come TRUE.
At least the global war will END.
Just try to apply to become a member of European country council (ECC) will be a nightmare. They need Only rich and economically developed countries to join :(
In olden days there were no passport and visa world was one country like and people lived in their own culture happily in countries like India with rich culture heritage. then some western thieves from poor counties britain etc came with out visas and looted friendly indian and became rich. Now they have no shame to call them self rich, which they forget that wealth is looted one.Kohinoor dimond is good example. still shines on british crown. Shame! And QDC lover If you see these white thieves went to autralian( ur country) and looted aboriginal their also. and still they do not give legal rights to aboriginals in their own land, Shame less people. If whole world is one country these imagine how the world will be???
Stupid to discuss something, thats never going to happen.. :D
@happygolucky: So, what was the name of the country that invaded East Pakistan (now Banngladesh) in 1971?
Just want to fresh up my memory.
It will only change the world from the current hierarchy in which the rich controls the poor, to another hierarchy where the "physically" strong controls the weak
plus all wars will be called "civil wars"
all wld be american
I think it would probably be peaceful. If we could do away with borders it would mean that we could do away with narrow nationalism and embrace an internationalist identify.
The bigots and racists (who call other nations smelly and poor) would be marginalized to they would be banished in smelly prisons in far away islands.
Thats A Good One
OK Saaaaaaaaaaaaaar!!
Whats the problem with dreaming?
It will be a big chaos!
"poor countries like India would invade"... history suggests otherwise....India never tried to invade and has in fact been pampering the countries who actually attempted to invade it.
Then we wouldnt have had smelly Indians and girls marked for saying "yes saaaaaaar", no difference in salaries based on passports, no erstwhile ramada parking talks of chinese dolls and also no swiss accounts...:)
It is something we should do. There would be chaos to start with as people from poor countries like India would invade the richer ones but eventually it would all balance out and a natural equillibrium would occur.