Well, just quick answers for those who don't consider the detailed description of the embryological stages in the Quran to be a proof enough for its divinity being the Word of Allah:
1- For those who don't want to read or hear such miraculous things, of course it will not be a proof. It is a proof only for those who are keen on looking at things through an objective eye and non-biased hearts.
2- How can one reasonably argue that such an adequate scientific reference in a Book conveyed to people by an illiterate desert man (who didn’t know to write even his name) 1400 years ago can not be a proof of the Divinity of that book?
3- Isn’t it worth pondering that a book revealed 14 centuries ago contains tens of scientific references with modern science and technology confirming them letter by letter?
The Quran stands the test for centuries, and declared the challenge to human kind all over the ages to find a single discrepancy in it or to produce a single chapter like. Far from finding any contradiction in it, as time passes, scientists from different fields (AND THEY ARE NON-MUSLIMS BTW ) come to confirms these Quranic findings knowingly or otherwise.
Any one interested in the search for truth can probe the Quranic scientific references and expose them to scrutiny to see whether they are in consistency with modern science or not, if he/she is serious and keen on truth.
As for those who don't respect logic and science and look at them as fruitless and void of any credit, it is natural that no proof is of any use.
While for those who respect their minds and look at things through an objective eye, non-biased heart and illuminated mind, things will be totally different.
Watch and listen to what Prof. Keith Moore, a world prominent scientist in anatomy (dept. of surgery), says about this issue which some of you don't regard it as a proof:
Well, just quick answers for those who don't consider the detailed description of the embryological stages in the Quran to be a proof enough for its divinity being the Word of Allah:
1- For those who don't want to read or hear such miraculous things, of course it will not be a proof. It is a proof only for those who are keen on looking at things through an objective eye and non-biased hearts.
2- How can one reasonably argue that such an adequate scientific reference in a Book conveyed to people by an illiterate desert man (who didn’t know to write even his name) 1400 years ago can not be a proof of the Divinity of that book?
3- Isn’t it worth pondering that a book revealed 14 centuries ago contains tens of scientific references with modern science and technology confirming them letter by letter?
The Quran stands the test for centuries, and declared the challenge to human kind all over the ages to find a single discrepancy in it or to produce a single chapter like. Far from finding any contradiction in it, as time passes, scientists from different fields (AND THEY ARE NON-MUSLIMS BTW ) come to confirms these Quranic findings knowingly or otherwise.
Any one interested in the search for truth can probe the Quranic scientific references and expose them to scrutiny to see whether they are in consistency with modern science or not, if he/she is serious and keen on truth.
As for those who don't respect logic and science and look at them as fruitless and void of any credit, it is natural that no proof is of any use.
While for those who respect their minds and look at things through an objective eye, non-biased heart and illuminated mind, things will be totally different.
Watch and listen to what Prof. Keith Moore, a world prominent scientist in anatomy (dept. of surgery), says about this issue which some of you don't regard it as a proof:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egDYF_oQ4yc