the way i see it......for a minute, lets just move away from the fact that this is 'hymen replacement' - in principle - is it not the same as saying to a cocaine addict " you chose to take cocaine, hence we will not use taxpayer funds to try to rid you of your addiction"
as an ex-NHS manager, the NHS does not look at WHY a condition exists before picking up the remedial costs, rather it weighs out the costs in terms of added quality of life for the patient.
sure , i understand the 'hymen' issue is unique, and to be completely frank, i dont think NHS should fund it either, but if the NHS has a principle it applies then it must be applied uniformly and without prejudice - to ADD LIFE QUALITY......
the way i see it......for a minute, lets just move away from the fact that this is 'hymen replacement' - in principle - is it not the same as saying to a cocaine addict " you chose to take cocaine, hence we will not use taxpayer funds to try to rid you of your addiction"
as an ex-NHS manager, the NHS does not look at WHY a condition exists before picking up the remedial costs, rather it weighs out the costs in terms of added quality of life for the patient.
sure , i understand the 'hymen' issue is unique, and to be completely frank, i dont think NHS should fund it either, but if the NHS has a principle it applies then it must be applied uniformly and without prejudice - to ADD LIFE QUALITY......