They may be referring to him as her "partner" because they may have been married by an Imam, which I dont think is recognized in the UK as it may not be registered in the courts.
UK law doesnt state that a persons face must be visable for testimony to be accepted as testimony can be accepted in written form as well. This was the discretion of the Magistrate.
They may be referring to him as her "partner" because they may have been married by an Imam, which I dont think is recognized in the UK as it may not be registered in the courts.
UK law doesnt state that a persons face must be visable for testimony to be accepted as testimony can be accepted in written form as well. This was the discretion of the Magistrate.