and Tink surely it depends on irrevocable evidence to determine the individuals guilt in the matter. Would you advocate the dp if there was concern that the guilty verdict was unsound?? Because that was the case here.

There are issues here - if a person is found guilty on the evidence presented at the time and executed then I understand that - I dont agree with it because of the subsequent point Im going to make, but I undestand it.

My argument is that if subsequent to the verdict, evidence is produced that contradicts the verdict or throws it into the unsound verdict category then there is a problem and unfortunately because of the irreveribility of the dp, its a problem that cant be undone irrespective of the crime however heinous.