'Dintovich' - you claim to be stating facts but you refuse to supply any information as to how you have arrived at them. This is because they are not facts, but actually judgemental opinions. So don't be surprised if your use of such perjorative language e.g. 'spoilt rich kids' is not questioned. Now that you're asked to clarify, you backpeddle and change it to 'kids that have been brought up by maid in palaces' - which is hardly the same thing is it?
If this was a court of law, which it isn't, and nobody appointed you the judge, we would also want to know why you haven't answered a direct question to you - where do your children attend school? - If you indeed have any.
The main reason I think we all want to know is because the general opinion from parents who send their children to Sherborne is positive. But yours is negative and disparaging. This is fair enough, you're entitled to your opinion - but it is the exception.
Thus, we naturally want to know on what do you base your opinion - do you actually have experience of working there or sending your own children there? The other background stuff you're trying to introduce into the argument is irrelevant to assessing the quality of the school, and so are your opinions if you don't have any actual, recent direct experience with the school(s) in question.
'Dintovich' - you claim to be stating facts but you refuse to supply any information as to how you have arrived at them. This is because they are not facts, but actually judgemental opinions. So don't be surprised if your use of such perjorative language e.g. 'spoilt rich kids' is not questioned. Now that you're asked to clarify, you backpeddle and change it to 'kids that have been brought up by maid in palaces' - which is hardly the same thing is it?
If this was a court of law, which it isn't, and nobody appointed you the judge, we would also want to know why you haven't answered a direct question to you - where do your children attend school? - If you indeed have any.
The main reason I think we all want to know is because the general opinion from parents who send their children to Sherborne is positive. But yours is negative and disparaging. This is fair enough, you're entitled to your opinion - but it is the exception.
Thus, we naturally want to know on what do you base your opinion - do you actually have experience of working there or sending your own children there? The other background stuff you're trying to introduce into the argument is irrelevant to assessing the quality of the school, and so are your opinions if you don't have any actual, recent direct experience with the school(s) in question.
So, how about being 'honest' with us?