ive seen this sentiment posted elsewhere but i agree with it and will repeat it.
when a member of the public stalks some1 and posts their private pictures online, its called voyeurism and is an arrestable offense, but when cheap magazines fund said stalking its called "journalism". something stinks about that.
im all for media freedom and all but private lives ought not to be poked into. this, phone tapping and god knows wht else they are upto.
ive seen this sentiment posted elsewhere but i agree with it and will repeat it.
when a member of the public stalks some1 and posts their private pictures online, its called voyeurism and is an arrestable offense, but when cheap magazines fund said stalking its called "journalism". something stinks about that.
im all for media freedom and all but private lives ought not to be poked into. this, phone tapping and god knows wht else they are upto.