Killing another in self-defence
Killing another in self-defence is one’s right.
A person can kill another when there exists a reasonable apprehension that his adversary is going to cause him/her grievous injury even though he might not have actually inflicted any, the Supreme Court of india ruled.
Source:http://www.livemint.com/2009/03/12162641/Killing-another-in-selfdefenc.html
Do you agree or disagree ?
cheers_by
catsniper
Anywhere in the world.
Burden of proof on the party alleging self-defense.
*****************************************
Don't want no drama,
No, no drama, no, no, no, no drama
It works that way in Texas. Yee Haw!
who is wrong or right? When you killed the other party already? I guess that's why we have courts - to decide - otherwise, one is always innocent until proven guilty.
"I do live by the motto that pessimists are usually right, but all the great change in history was done by optimists" -Thomas Friedman
Does this ‘right’ documented by law enforcement every where in the world? Hmm...In that case lot of murderers must be getting away with major loophole like this.
Moving on is simple; it's what you leave behind that makes it so difficult .
Can I can kill some people when they're driving wrecklesly? Maybe two a day? :)))
Cheers,
Austin
You have this "right" everywhere in the world!