Truth Hurts, Lies Kill

Uranus where ever they go they will make a mess and leave a mess behind as they have done in the past. I am quite sure about Pakistan's invasion because of some corroborative facts and they are:

1. Israel sent its jets many times to India to invade Pakistan and target military targets.

2. A lot of people don't know but Pakistan has a lot of rich un-explored resources including oil, gas and gold which are the worlds biggest reserves and US and Chinese companies are using all means including funding and providing weapons to armed groups on the border of Iran and Afghanistan, to get to them.

3. Strategically it is very important because of border with Iran and China.

4. The country is "Islamic Republic" considered as a threat by many.

5. It is impossible for US to control Afghanistan. Nobody ever did. Anglo-Afghan wars and other historical events have proved this. Pakistan will be relatively a soft target and easier to control.

6. It is hard for US to think of a nuclear capable country with effective military capabilities in the region. SO at first black ops and CIA will try to weaken it politically, economically and socially and then cross the borders. US is already involved in military operations in the region directly or through mercenaries. In fact thousands of them are working in Pak and said to be involved in bombings, target killings etc.

That's why he's invading Uranus. No transfer fees ;)

Pilgram--I doubt he could afford the 'transfer' fee.

There is a funny story about a group of Americans that get their own against the Nigerian email fraudsters.

http://idratherbewriting.com/2008/09/19/recommended-podcast-the-enforcers-from-this-american-life/

I heard the US was going to invade Nigeria because Obama received an email from an ousted Nigerian Princess who promises him 480 trillion dollars if he sends her his account information.

Goldie123--Nice to agree for a change. If the West sends in troops, I'd be shocked to see large numbers of Americans.

I don't think US interests would be served by trying to take Pakistan, but the US has made poor decisions in the past so who knows what it will do. Pakistan is too much like Afghanistan--not enough natural resources worth exploiting and difficult terrain.

I would think US interests would be better served by keeping Pakistan relatively destabilized--too weak to threaten India (with which the US is much closer and has more long-term interests) or continue developing its nuclear program but not so weak that it becomes another anarchy like Afghanistan. The best way to do this is to pressure the government and send in the CIA and black ops, which as you point out they are already doing.

My sense is that Nigeria will be the next hot spot the US seriously commits to in terms of military manpower. It's Africa's largest oil exporter, it's not in anyone's sphere of influence (so no major power gets annoyed), plenty of the oil goes to the US and US companies, and it's a mess. Most of the world won't care (the Muslim word tends to get more upset about Arab Muslims and Christians have not fussed all that much about sub-Saharan Africa). A free hand for the US is a dangerous thing.

I agree with Uranus and don't think US is much interested in Libya. Staying in Libya for long will rather damage their interests.

I guess or should I say I have little doubts that the next target is Pakistan. They already have CIA bases there. Blackwater is hired for under cover ops and every now and then they are talking about Pakistan's nuclear installations. Full military control of Pakistan will mean control of their nuclear facilities and will serve the best interests of US and Israel.

The video represents a good picture of what the majority of the people in the world think about US activities and is an eye opener for US citizens to think before they poll their vote and to stop their leaders to commit acts of genocide to serve the interests of corporations for which whatever terms they use, or what ever reasons they provide are brutal and against the interests of humanity.

US is attracting much more enemies after invading other states then it ever had before.

The US is leaving Iraq. That much equipment and personnel is estimated to take at least another year to withdraw (think how long it took to get it all there). They will probably been Afghanistan for a very long time, but so long as Bahrain and Qatar continue to host US bases, there is little need for a significant presence in Iraq. After all it's all about the flow of oil from the Gulf. The US is highly unlikely to put troops of any sort in Libya. Public opinion is adamantly against it, and US actions thus far indicate no reason to think Obama will not pursue his stated policy. The US strategic interests in Libya are very limited, as the US gets its oil from elsewhere. It has no bases there, and it neither needs Libyan oil nor bases in Libya to achieve its global strategic objectives. For any North African interests, Morocco has been more than obliging and Egypt is highly likely to continue to be obliging given the Egyptian military's longstanding ties to the US.

Other Western countries, particularly the UK and France, have stated an interest in putting troops there, but then they have strategic interests in Libya. My sense is that the US would offer is allies some logistical assistance, but no much beyond that.

bit of propaganda.

She has an American accent- so educated in the US or at an American school and quotes a Jew at the end.

It defies logic it really does.

I am not a ‘lover’ of the Bush/Blair regime but this is propaganda at its worse.

OK...Point Noted.

Impressive speech.

I don't think anyone knows why they are still in Iraq.

Stop the terror acts and the war will stop.. it's that simple!!!