Gypsy dear when you give any evidence to support you r theory does that change that theory in to a fact.
Let me show you how it is done
An analogy is used to understand a related occurence
for which a hypothesis is developed to undertsand the occurence
After which a theory is developed to try to recreate the unexplained or unidentified occurence
If the whole thing can then be recreated in real life scenario it becomes a fact.
With all the genome projects in the world we cant recreate evolution in a controlled environement
hence the theory remains a theory and cant be called a fact
do u understand now
that is the reason why i can hold my view
because just like your sided theories are based on a hypothesis
there are other theories which have their own hypothesis
Gypsy dear when you give any evidence to support you r theory does that change that theory in to a fact.
Let me show you how it is done
An analogy is used to understand a related occurence
for which a hypothesis is developed to undertsand the occurence
After which a theory is developed to try to recreate the unexplained or unidentified occurence
If the whole thing can then be recreated in real life scenario it becomes a fact.
With all the genome projects in the world we cant recreate evolution in a controlled environement
hence the theory remains a theory and cant be called a fact
do u understand now
that is the reason why i can hold my view
because just like your sided theories are based on a hypothesis
there are other theories which have their own hypothesis