It prescribes the death penalty for all times on a sextual act by a married person outside his marriage
But the apostasy law was as i mentioned before didnt concern the peaceful disembarkation from the faith. For further proof there is a Surah in the Quran which says
Whoever kills a person without his being guilty of murder or of creating unrest in the land, is as though he kills the whole of mankind. (Al-Maaidah 5: 32)
The killing is allowed for someone who creates unrest in the world, like the terrorists
What i am trying to say is that some people apply verbatim the rulings, which is not correct
The hadith which Eco savvy mentions was applicable to the pagan Quraish who were at war with the Muslims and wanted to annihilate them because of their faith. If a person from Quraish who left Islam after accepting it or wasnt a Muslim altogether, was eventually the other sides ally and wud fight the Muslims in the future.
People have to understand that Quran was meant as a law giver till the end of time whereas the application of the Hadiths (Prophets Guidance) maybe applicable for all time or for a particular time period depending upon the situation it was given in.
But as i said before the Law for killing a person who commits any sextual act even though he is married is death and if it doesnt go with laws of the EU, so be it
Saying that a particular punishment is too barbaric or otherwise, is basically giving a value judgment about that punishment. And if anyone remembers his fathers outlook on lifes values will understand that manmade values keep on changing with time.
Eco savvy ur right about the Hadith
It prescribes the death penalty for all times on a sextual act by a married person outside his marriage
But the apostasy law was as i mentioned before didnt concern the peaceful disembarkation from the faith. For further proof there is a Surah in the Quran which says
Whoever kills a person without his being guilty of murder or of creating unrest in the land, is as though he kills the whole of mankind. (Al-Maaidah 5: 32)
The killing is allowed for someone who creates unrest in the world, like the terrorists
What i am trying to say is that some people apply verbatim the rulings, which is not correct
The hadith which Eco savvy mentions was applicable to the pagan Quraish who were at war with the Muslims and wanted to annihilate them because of their faith. If a person from Quraish who left Islam after accepting it or wasnt a Muslim altogether, was eventually the other sides ally and wud fight the Muslims in the future.
People have to understand that Quran was meant as a law giver till the end of time whereas the application of the Hadiths (Prophets Guidance) maybe applicable for all time or for a particular time period depending upon the situation it was given in.
But as i said before the Law for killing a person who commits any sextual act even though he is married is death and if it doesnt go with laws of the EU, so be it
Saying that a particular punishment is too barbaric or otherwise, is basically giving a value judgment about that punishment. And if anyone remembers his fathers outlook on lifes values will understand that manmade values keep on changing with time.
[img_assist|nid=53425|title=c|desc=|link=none|align=left|width=|height=0]