as during this time there have been the most written accounts of any time before in history. I understand how perhaps certain parts of documented history would not be easy or prudent to explain therefore declaring it not credible when in fact it is would be expedient. Slight of hand does not work when multiple sources have documented near identical events...particularly interesting is when most people following that faith in this present day are not aware of these circumstances and are all to quick to mention the corruption of other holy works before questioning the validity of their own...and perhaps then they would not be so flippant if they were more knowledgeable.
as during this time there have been the most written accounts of any time before in history. I understand how perhaps certain parts of documented history would not be easy or prudent to explain therefore declaring it not credible when in fact it is would be expedient. Slight of hand does not work when multiple sources have documented near identical events...particularly interesting is when most people following that faith in this present day are not aware of these circumstances and are all to quick to mention the corruption of other holy works before questioning the validity of their own...and perhaps then they would not be so flippant if they were more knowledgeable.