You are just jealous of our self deprecating universal use of language. Our use of venacular is intended to include everyone and not to exclude some according to an anachronistic concept of class superiority based on accent and pronunciation.
The English language has never been pure. It has always evolved (look at Chaucer and Shakespeare and more recently, Trollope). It will continue to evolve, it is just that the shapers of the language have changed. No longer is it true that the sun never sets on the British Empire. In any event, British English is diverse in its own right. What about the unintelligable nonsense Glaswegians or people from the North of England spout?
It makes American English sound positively erudite in comparison.
Just call me Tigasin. That's what I'm talking about
You are just jealous of our self deprecating universal use of language. Our use of venacular is intended to include everyone and not to exclude some according to an anachronistic concept of class superiority based on accent and pronunciation.
The English language has never been pure. It has always evolved (look at Chaucer and Shakespeare and more recently, Trollope). It will continue to evolve, it is just that the shapers of the language have changed. No longer is it true that the sun never sets on the British Empire. In any event, British English is diverse in its own right. What about the unintelligable nonsense Glaswegians or people from the North of England spout?
It makes American English sound positively erudite in comparison.
Just call me Tigasin. That's what I'm talking about