Point is, like what you've stated early on in this thread, in contrast --I also can't believe the great vast wide openness of your mind (as my peers would say, the tree hugging freedom fighters). As much as I would like to agree with what you said that the "appropriate" dressing standards is a judgment of one's own that has the society as it's level ground is also infact unnecessarily determind by it, I think the point of discussion is not what one's freedom of choice is determined by, rather what borders it.

And I quote, "What is and what is not considered morally offensive is always in a state of flux, so anyone who attempts to say something is acceptable, and some things are not, is only showing their ignorance on the subject of morals."
Someone who attempts to say something is acceptable and some are not is not showing their ignorance on the subject of morals. You confuse by using big words, but it's all so simple, really. Morals is not a subject of either or, neither it is of black or white. I believe that the subject of morality will always be one that is of conradiction but I do not think that being in the state of flux has anything with, again as I state and excuse me for the redundancy --the contradictories of morality.

I think I see where you're coming from as I quote your own words, "You only believe it is, because you have been led to believe it is".