As I have stated before, this is one issue which may not be as heavy and yes this is a trail but you have to think in a broader perspective, not case by case. You have to keep in mind an entire population/nation and the effect continuous negative/disputable media coverage has on nationals. Accumulated the nation has had a wave of information both national and international and will ultimately react by voting on right wing parties that generally oppose loss of national identity, worse parties may become extreme right.
As goes for Sharia-courts, 5 were acknowledged by the British government. There were supposedly 85. Denis MacEoin wrote a report stating that illegal, or humanitarian law contradicting,verdicts were issued. This information does not fall from the sky or is sucked out of a thick thumb. GB has been dumb enough to open one door and has now different levels of justice. According to the mentioned source Sharia courts have approved polygamous marriages, approved forced intercourse and forbidden Muslima's to marry non-Muslims unless they converted. We all know the huge differences between Muslims, from liberal to moderate to extreme so this type of justice is a recipe for chaos. It may work exellent in Saudi or Yemen, not in Europe.
Militude, you think from your perspective from your religious backdrop and fail to see the potential consequences of a divided society. If you were to think what the sociological or ethnological effects are of accumulated incidents, you will come to realize that this is a very pressing issue that has been boiling under the surface for a long time and will sooner or later burst. History has taught us the negatives of nationalism, if a certain group chooses to force its stamp on society they will only be accelerating their own downfall.
As I have stated before, this is one issue which may not be as heavy and yes this is a trail but you have to think in a broader perspective, not case by case. You have to keep in mind an entire population/nation and the effect continuous negative/disputable media coverage has on nationals. Accumulated the nation has had a wave of information both national and international and will ultimately react by voting on right wing parties that generally oppose loss of national identity, worse parties may become extreme right.
As goes for Sharia-courts, 5 were acknowledged by the British government. There were supposedly 85. Denis MacEoin wrote a report stating that illegal, or humanitarian law contradicting,verdicts were issued. This information does not fall from the sky or is sucked out of a thick thumb. GB has been dumb enough to open one door and has now different levels of justice. According to the mentioned source Sharia courts have approved polygamous marriages, approved forced intercourse and forbidden Muslima's to marry non-Muslims unless they converted. We all know the huge differences between Muslims, from liberal to moderate to extreme so this type of justice is a recipe for chaos. It may work exellent in Saudi or Yemen, not in Europe.
Militude, you think from your perspective from your religious backdrop and fail to see the potential consequences of a divided society. If you were to think what the sociological or ethnological effects are of accumulated incidents, you will come to realize that this is a very pressing issue that has been boiling under the surface for a long time and will sooner or later burst. History has taught us the negatives of nationalism, if a certain group chooses to force its stamp on society they will only be accelerating their own downfall.