Why always playing 'on the man' and close with little insults, it makes you extremely poor in the debate. Which is sad because if you would leave out your 'below the belt' attempts, which miss target, you'd be respectable.
Equally, you seem disgruntled as this topic touches your personal convictions and make you rather emotional. A true debater does not mingle his voice with emotions. You can put all our opinions into perspective, defend your stance and leave out the provocations, even when provoked as this would make your opponent the 'lesser'.
Second,
Militude,
Why always playing 'on the man' and close with little insults, it makes you extremely poor in the debate. Which is sad because if you would leave out your 'below the belt' attempts, which miss target, you'd be respectable.
Equally, you seem disgruntled as this topic touches your personal convictions and make you rather emotional. A true debater does not mingle his voice with emotions. You can put all our opinions into perspective, defend your stance and leave out the provocations, even when provoked as this would make your opponent the 'lesser'.