You least of all should judge Happy Happy. She advocates and upholds her religion and doesn't twist it into a neo-hippy-style-Islam which is what you are trying so desperately to but failing at so miserably at. You need only to search her posts to see how balanced and tolerant an example she portrays in her beliefs.
She was responding to someone who assumed you were someone else incognito, which you aren't because as she said that person was against alcohol consumption.
Now I don't believe you are for real, or you are immature.
If you were, you would have noticed that during the beginning of my posts in this thread I reminded you over and over that what you should be more honest with yourself in your belief and not associate yourself with set doctrines and then under the 'safety clause' by association try to get away with crap.
Having pointed that out to I tried to view your debate objectively in light of the current affairs in Qatar and the spirit of equality the country appears to advocate. I offered a new angle of debate regarding this matter...I wonder why you overlooked it?
There appears to be an ulterior motive otherwise you wouldn't have allowed something so big in your favor that offers you a solution pass..again an ulterior motive??
NUCLEAR WEAPONS: IF AMERICA AND ISRAEL CAN HAVE THEM - THEN SO SHOULD IRAN.
Supersillygirl
You least of all should judge Happy Happy. She advocates and upholds her religion and doesn't twist it into a neo-hippy-style-Islam which is what you are trying so desperately to but failing at so miserably at. You need only to search her posts to see how balanced and tolerant an example she portrays in her beliefs.
She was responding to someone who assumed you were someone else incognito, which you aren't because as she said that person was against alcohol consumption.
Now I don't believe you are for real, or you are immature.
If you were, you would have noticed that during the beginning of my posts in this thread I reminded you over and over that what you should be more honest with yourself in your belief and not associate yourself with set doctrines and then under the 'safety clause' by association try to get away with crap.
Having pointed that out to I tried to view your debate objectively in light of the current affairs in Qatar and the spirit of equality the country appears to advocate. I offered a new angle of debate regarding this matter...I wonder why you overlooked it?
There appears to be an ulterior motive otherwise you wouldn't have allowed something so big in your favor that offers you a solution pass..again an ulterior motive??
NUCLEAR WEAPONS: IF AMERICA AND ISRAEL CAN HAVE THEM - THEN SO SHOULD IRAN.