I was talking abt this article.
http://www.fakingnews.com/2009/10/unable-to-attract-even-a-single-girl-f...

Anyways, it just goes to show that you can file any ridiculous thing in courts, especially in delhi, where you seem to hail from. Yet to hear anything like this from other states you so look down upon. I donno what it has to do with where I am from. (Looks like you did a bit of research on me). If you consider urself superior to anyone coz you are from some part of the country and he is from somewhere else, then all I can do is laugh at your face.

Btw, thanx for giving me that wiki link, I found this there:

“All India Sunni Ulema Board on Sept 6, 2006, issued a fatwa that the Muslims can sing the first two verses of the song. The Board president Moulana Mufti Syed Shah Badruddin Qadri Aljeelani said that "If you bow at the feet of your mother with respect, it is not shirk but only respect."

I have read the link carefully but ther’s no reference to any attempt made to change the national song or make amendments. Only issues were about to use it or not.

About your judgment that I cannot understand Hindi, you can clarify with any of the hindi speaking people on QL who have met me personally. I do not need to prove it to something like you.

“not to bow the GODDESS DURGA or KAALI or any of thousands”
Vande Mataram also does not mean Bow to Kali or any other goddess. It means “Bow to Mother” It seems your own hindi needs some revision.
The stanza you are referring to just compares the power of the nation to that of the mythical goddess and does not give the meaning bow down to goddess. Anyways that stanza is not sung when you sing the national song. Listen to it more carefully next time.

Nobody is denying that takbeer existed for 1400 years long. The point is it wasn’t as commonly used during the freedom struggle as Vande Mataram. Hope you can get your head around that.

(Better don’t provoke me to come up with their falsified deeds).
Oh please, I am soooo scared!!
LOL…please do come up with their ‘falsified’ deeds, whatever that means. I have no issues with that. I myself has spoken against em before.

Casanova: Differentiating between the debate and the person needs maturity. Hope you can grasp that.

Abt Nic or whoever else commenting on the problem:
This is a public forum and he has as much right to comment on this forum as you do. You dont own the forum, casanova!