of all the religion and nations. An artist and art cannot be biased. If they are, then the sense of artist and art form which you expressed cannot fall TRUE. In case of MFH, he is biased. If you had followed his work closely - your interpretation would have been different. For an artist, what you told is true, but MFH is LESS ARTIST AND MORE BIGOT.
If you need to see all his works, I have it and can mail you. For example - When he painted HITLER - headless and nude, he went to media and said he did so out of hatred for him. But when he did painted GODDESS of a particular religion - nude, he and people like you said - ITS A ART FORM. If we take it as a art form for a while, why he did not touch other religous figures or ladies from other religions ??
of all the religion and nations. An artist and art cannot be biased. If they are, then the sense of artist and art form which you expressed cannot fall TRUE. In case of MFH, he is biased. If you had followed his work closely - your interpretation would have been different. For an artist, what you told is true, but MFH is LESS ARTIST AND MORE BIGOT.
If you need to see all his works, I have it and can mail you. For example - When he painted HITLER - headless and nude, he went to media and said he did so out of hatred for him. But when he did painted GODDESS of a particular religion - nude, he and people like you said - ITS A ART FORM. If we take it as a art form for a while, why he did not touch other religous figures or ladies from other religions ??