just at thought...

i think if michael would be referred to as jesus christ, then michael as per christian belief would mean a god? for he (christ) has been categorically considered as one. though it is referred to in scriptures of christian beliefs as said above that indeed he would "descend from heaven with a commanding call, with an archangel’s voice..." would mean the same as a being already? i think not.

it would be proper to say and with a common sense that if god is god he would also has the power of any archangel whereas an archangel would still be an angel regardless to a certain point that god has given him authority or power.

for what i knew in christian faith that only one name has given authority over things than the name of jesus christ, it's but by god an angel would have an authority or power, henceforth no angel nor an archangel would be in the same spiritual level as of god or jesus himself.

so as christ may become michael in any form, but michael an archangel, nor any other angels with such authority and power would never be christ... for he is as per the faith the only one's favored in the most high... for no angel in any authority nor power would take that place and assumed it's name for it'll mean that doing so would no longer be considered an angel... what more an arch.

michael the archangel was mentioned in scriptures in that way and there's no appropriate term to best describe him than that for i think people wrote those scritures knows well what's god and what's an angel in the first place that's why they make it that way and in the course of time accepted it the same way.

so let's leave god for being god and angels for angels where it should belong, for only god not angels may know the truth in the end.

^_^