I don't think QL quite understands what we're saying.
QL, lets say then, that men are better at maths. 5 women and 5 men take a test. The mens scores out of 10 are, 8, 8, 7, 6, & 5. The womens scores are 7, 6, 6, 5 & 4. Now yes, the men on average did score higher. However, the men are not all better at maths than all the women. In fact, there are 3 women who are better at maths than 1 guy, two of them equal to another guy, and another woman equal to and above 2 guys.
By assuming all men are better at maths than all women, you shoot yourself in the foot by potentially giving credibility to a man that perhaps is not as good as his female counterparts.
Anyway, that being said, like I stated before, there is no conclusive evidence that men are better than women in maths, and there is just as much opposing evidence. If you are not good at maths compared to the males around you, don't assume to think it applies for all females.
I don't think QL quite understands what we're saying.
QL, lets say then, that men are better at maths. 5 women and 5 men take a test. The mens scores out of 10 are, 8, 8, 7, 6, & 5. The womens scores are 7, 6, 6, 5 & 4. Now yes, the men on average did score higher. However, the men are not all better at maths than all the women. In fact, there are 3 women who are better at maths than 1 guy, two of them equal to another guy, and another woman equal to and above 2 guys.
By assuming all men are better at maths than all women, you shoot yourself in the foot by potentially giving credibility to a man that perhaps is not as good as his female counterparts.
Anyway, that being said, like I stated before, there is no conclusive evidence that men are better than women in maths, and there is just as much opposing evidence. If you are not good at maths compared to the males around you, don't assume to think it applies for all females.